<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>S P A C E   C  O W B O Y S: Burning Man trademark fracas</title>
    <link>http://www.spacecowboys.org/articles/2007/01/18/burning-man-trademark-fracas</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>Burning Man trademark fracas</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;By now most of the community has probably heard about the John Law vs BM trademark lawsuit. It&amp;#8217;s been on &lt;a href="http://laughingsquid.com/john-law-sues-his-former-burning-man-partners/and"&gt;Laughing Squid&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/01/09/legal_battle_between.html"&gt;BoingBoing&lt;/a&gt; and even on &lt;a href="http://news.com.com/2061-10802_3-6148848.html"&gt;CNET&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;The summary of what I&amp;#8217;ve read is that &lt;a href="http://johnlawspeaks.wordpress.com/2007/01/09/does-burning-man-belong-to-everyone/"&gt;John Law&lt;/a&gt; wants to the Burning Man trademarks to go Public Domain, while the BM organization wants to retain control because, &lt;a href="http://www.burningman.com/news/johnlawcomplaint_07.html"&gt;according to Maid Marrian&amp;#8217;s response to the suit&lt;/a&gt;, they are concerned about commercialization.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#8217;t know a ton about copyright law, except that it&amp;#8217;s a tangled ugly mess, and so far I haven&amp;#8217;t heard anyone talk about an option that would involve &lt;a href="http://creativecommons.org/"&gt;Creative Commons&lt;/a&gt; licensing. But to me, this seems like a prefect application of the &amp;#8220;Some rights reserved&amp;#8221; approach. CC offers flexible licenses that would, for example, allow a Burning Man fan to use the Burning Man trademark in an art piece that goes on public display, but would not allow Mattel to launch Burner Barbie&amp;#169; next x-mas. There are a variety of legal attributions, &lt;a href="http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses"&gt;detailed on the CC site&lt;/a&gt;, and I hope when this matter goes to arbitration the parties involved think about what&amp;#8217;s right for the community, and keep that in the forefront, regardless of how much they want the other party to eat shit and die.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:46:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:c07853fa-2af7-4a85-9c79-caf4cecec008</guid>
      <author>8Ball</author>
      <link>http://www.spacecowboys.org/articles/2007/01/18/burning-man-trademark-fracas</link>
      <category>Burning Man</category>
      <category>Rants</category>
      <category>Culture</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
